LOWER TAX RATES

 

Now that Congress has agreed to fund the federal government until January 15, 2014 and lift the debt ceiling until February 7, 2014 commonly referred to, as (kickin the can down the road), in Washington D.C  ALL Republicans will unite, and fill the media 24/7 by repeating what they have been saying for almost 100 years –LOWER TAX RATES

 

IF TAX RATE ARE TOO HIGH

 

Why are 1,342 billionaires living in the U.S., more than TEN times the number that live in China, the country in second place, and compared to 29 who live in Canada and 37 in Brazil?

 

Why is the U.S home to the world’s largest number of millionare households, 5.22 million, more than THREE times the number of millionaires who live in Japan, 1.53 million, which is in second place?

 

How did the following 20 Americans on Forbes list of  the 50  richest Americans accumulate their billions?

 

Bill Gates $72B (Billion), Warren Buffett $58.5B, Larry Ellison $41B, Charles Koch $36B, David Koch $36B, Christy Walton $35.4B, Jim Walton $33.8B, Alice Walton $33.5B, Robson Walton $33.3B, Miachel Bloomberg $31B, Sheldon Adelson $28.5B, Jeff Bezos $27.2B, Larry Page $24.9B, Sergey Brin $24.4B, Forrest Mars $20.5, Jacquelin Mars $20.5B, John Mars $20.5B, Carl Ican $20.3B, George Soros $20B, Mark Zuckerberger $19B

 

How did Sam Walton in 1969 take one store in Bentonville Arkansas and build Wal Mart into the second largest corporation in the world and make and keep enough money that 44 years later in 2013 four of his children would have enough assets to be listed as the 6^th, 7^th, 8^th, and 9^th richest people in America with assets worth more than $136 billion.

 

How did Frank Mars who started Mars Candy Company in 1911 make and keep enough money for family members to be listed as the 10^th, 11^th and 12^th richest Americans 102 years later with assets worth more than $61 billion.

 

How did Exxon-Mobile make $82,561.00 PROFIT PER MINUTE FOR THREE MONTHS?

 

How did Fred Koch start Koch Industries in 1940 and his sons Charles and David  73 years later have enough assets to be  listed as America’s 4^th and 5^th richest Americans with assets worth more than  $72 billion.

 

How did Mark Zuckerberg start Facebook in 2004 and 9 years later at age 29 own enough assets to be listed as America’s 20^th  richest person worth $19 billion.

 

MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE 35 % U.S. TAX RATE IS THE TAX RATE PAID

Warren Buffett  the second richest man in America  PAYS a tax rate of 11.08% on his billions while his secretary pays a 35% tax rate.

 

Mitt Romney said for the past 10 years he had not paid a rate less than 13% on his $20 million dollar income he receives from his $250 million in various banks around the world which he accumulated after working only 15 years.

 

Almost two-thirds of ALL U.S corporations, 4.5 million “S” corporations , in 2013 filed 1120S tax forms and paid 0 FEDERAL CORPORATE INCOME TAX.

 

Corporations for profit in 2010 according to Forbes magazine PAY on average a tax rate of 12.6%.

 

HISTORY SHOW LOWERING THE TAX RATE CREATES ECONOMIC DISASTER

A Republican President George W Bush and a Republican controlled Congress enacted the greatest tax rate cut in America’s history and America suffered the second greatest economic disaster in history—LOSING 2.6 million jobs the last year Bush was in the White House and INCREASING the national debt 100% the second highest percentage increase in history to Republican 300% Reagan.

 

A Democrat President, Bill Clinton and a Democrat controlled Congress INCREASED the tax rate  (without the vote of a single Republican who said  raising taxes  would cause the economy to collapse.)  During the time Clinton was in the White House 22 million new jobs were created, there was a budget surplus 4 years, there was a record 6 year drop of the number of people living in poverty, lowest unemployment rate in 30 years, lowest inflation since 1960

 

When Republican George W. Bush assumed office the Dow Jones Industrial Average was 10,587 and 7,949 when he left office.   The Dow has almost doubled under Democrat President  Obama and on October 18, 2013 was at 15,399

 

REPUBLICAN METHOD OF LOWERING BUFFETT AND ROMNEY’S TAXES

 

The Republican controlled House in September 2013 voted to CUT $40 BILLION from the Food Stamp Program and voted 42 times to deny 50 million Americans healthcare.

 

WHO WOULD GET A REPUBLICAN LOWER TAX RATE

 

America’s richest 1%, millionaires and billionaires received the most benefits from the Bush low tax rates.

 

You have a choice support or reject politicians who would deny the poor and disabled health benefits and food stamps so Buffett and Romney CAN PAY LESS TAXES.

 

 

 

MEDICARE FRAUD

 

“Raymond Sean Brown a 44 year old doctor from Cleveland, Tennessee is facing fraud charges after federal prosecutors accused him of getting $7.5 million in Medicare reimbursements for more than 17,000 injections he purportedly never gave.”

 

This recent article in the Arkansas-Democrat Gazette aroused my curiosity about how widespread was Medicare fraud, who was committing the fraud and who had the responsibility for preventing the fraud.

 

HOW WIDESPREAD IS MEDICARE FRAUD

 

Many studies indicate Medicare fraud cost taxpayers more than $60 billion dollars a year and some estimates of the fraud are as high as $300 billion a year.

 

In 2012 Congress authorized Medicare to spend $536 billion to care for 50 million elderly and disabled Americans, 16% of the federal budget, an amount sufficient to attract fraudulent schemes.

WHO IS STEALING FROM MEDICARE AND IN WHAT AMOUNTS

 

The top 10 corporate fraud cases with the amount of false claims, and some of the fines paid are:

 

Tenet Healthcare--$900,000,000.—*HCA Healthcare-- $731,400.000.—paid over $840 million in criminal fines—Merck--$650,000.000.—*HCA—$631,000,000.—Serono--$567,000,000.--$136.9 million criminal fine—TAP--$559,483,560.--$290 million criminal fine—Schering Plough--$345,000,000— $180 million criminal fine.—Lilly Pharmacy--$438,000,00--$1.4 billion criminal fine—Abbots Labs $400,000,000.--$200 million criminal fines—Fresenius Medical $385,000,000.--$101 million criminal fines

 

WHO IS RESPONDIBLE FOR PROTECTING MEDICARE

Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S Constitution and the Constitutional amendments provide Congress shall have the power and authority over financial and budgetary matters and shall consist of 100 Senators and 435 House members. 

 

The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Department Of Justice to be headed by the Attorney General who has the responsibility to prosecute all federal crimes such as Medicare fraud.

 

TAXPAYER SUPPORT TO COMBAT MEDICARE FRAUD

 

To perform their jobs taxpayers provide Senators an annual salary of $174,000.00, have an average size staff of 34 at an average annual salary of $116,573.00.  The 435 House members receive an annual salary of $174,000.00 have an average sized staff of 14 at an average annual salary of $97,619.00.

 

Taxpayers in 2012 provided the Justice Department $27.1 billion for prosecuting Medicare and other federal crimes.

 

WHAT IS THE DEMOCRAT RECORD ON MEDICARE FRAUD

 

A Democrat controlled Congress with a Democrat President in the White House passed Obamacare which contains stricter penalties for Medicare fraud and better procedures for enforcement and locating Medicare fraud.

 

A Democrat controlled Justice Department appointed by President Obama, a Democrat President led by Attorney General Eric Holder in May 2013 brought fraud charges against 89 doctors, nurses and other licensed medical professionals in 8 cities for $223 million in false Medicare billings.  This was the 6^th national Medicare takedown involving 1,500 people being  charged with fraudulent Medicare schemes involving more than $5 billion.

 

 

WHAT IS THE REPUBLICAN RECORD ON MEDICARE FRAUD

 

Not a single Republican Congressman voted for Obamacare  with these stricter penalties and better enforcement of Medicare fraud.

 

The Republican controlled House has voted 42 times to repeal Obamacare at a cost of $1.45 millon per vote according to The Congressional Research Service.  You do the math on the total cost and time.

 

CONGRESSIONAL OVERALL APPROVAL, INCLUDING MEDICARE FRAUD

Numerous polls show only 10% of Americans approve of how Congress is performing its duty--9 out of 10 Americans DISAPPROVE  of the job Congress is doing.

 

The Senate and House have more than 40 Committees and many sub-committees, not one is called “Committee on Medicare Fraud.”

 

The last Congress (112) conducted more than 50 Committee hearings not one was on “Medicare Fraud.”

 

OTHER INFORMATION OF INTEREST ON MEDICARE FRAUD

How many of the 535 Congressmen accepted campaign contributions from people or corporations convicted of Medicare fraud?

 

In the 2012 election cycle 1,331 Super PAC”S spent $609,417,654.00 on political candidates and issues but not ONE was formed to reduce “Medicare Fraud.”

 

 

 

* HCA (Hospital Care of America) is the largest healthcare for-profit operator in the world located at Nashville, Tennessee.  It was founded by Dr. Thomas Frist Sr. and his sons Dr. Thomas Frist Jr and Dr. Bill Frist.  Dr. Bill Frist owned millions of dollars in HCA stock while serving in the U.S. Senate from 1995-2007 and the last 4 years as Republican Senate Majority Leader.  HCA is # 2 and #4 on the list of  top corporate Medicare frauds.  HCA plead guilty to 14 felonies for fraudulent billings, kickbacks and false costs and paid more than $2 billion in reimbursements and criminal fines. Senate Republican Leader  Frist sold all of his stock in HCA July 1, 2005, two weeks before disappointing earnings were announced, and HCA paid $20 million to shareholders for Senator Frist’s insider trading and accounting fraud.

OCTOBER 3, 1963—OCTOBER 3, 2013

 

President John F. Kennedy in his dedication speech at Greers Ferry Dam on October 3, 1963 described the Arkansas Congressional delegation in the following language:

 

“I suppose pound for pound the Arkansas delegation in the Congress of the United States wields more influence than any other delegation of any of the other 49 States. And I don’t  know whether  the people of Arkansas realize that your delegation holds within its hands, in a very real sense, not only a good many important measures which affect this State, but measures which also affect the country.”

 

“Senator Bill Fulbright, Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee handled and passed legislation with great distinction which gave us some hope of preventing a nuclear war with the Soviet Union.  Senator John McClellan is handling the Congressional investigation of crime and corruption.  Congressman Oren Harris is handling legislation dealing with mental health and building medical schools. Congressman Trimble is chairman of the Rules Committee which all bills must go through before they go to the floor of the House. Congressman Wilbur Mills, Chairman of the most influential Ways and Means Committee in the House which just 10 days ago passed a tax reform bill.”

 

“I think it is important that you in Arkansas realize that the decision you make in electing your Congressman and Senator has an influence not only on the lives of the people of this State, but also on the lives of the people of the entire country.  And I think this State can take the greatest pride and satisfaction in the way it has met this great responsibility in the people it sent to deal with the Nation’s business.”

 

ARKANSAS CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION ALL DEMOCRATS IN 1963

 

John McClellan served longer than any other U.S. Senator from Arkansas (1943-1977) during which time he was chairman of the Appropriations Committee  22 years and chairman of the Senate Permanent subcommittee on Investigations 15 years.

 

J. William Fulbright was U.S Senator from Arkansas 1945-1975 and served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

 

Wilbur D. Mills was an Arkansas congressman1939-1977 and served as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and is responsible for Medicare becoming law.

 

Took Gathings was an Arkansas congressman 1939-1969 and served as chairman of the House Agriculture Committee.

 

James W. Trimble was an Arkansas Congressman from 1944-1966 and a member of the powerful House Rules Committee

 

Oren Harris was an Arkansas Congressman 1953-1966 and served as chairman of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce and directed 4 House sub committees.

 

 

Former President Clinton in his 50^th anniversary speech of the Greers Ferry dedication

did not say (and no informed person believes) the 2013 Arkansas congressional delegation made up of 5 Republicans and 1 Democrat  “wields more influence than any other delegation of the other 49 states.”

 

95% of Americans on October 3, 2013 disapprove of the way the Arkansas congressional delegation, and the delegation from the other 49 states deal with the nation’s business.

 

In 2013 not one Arkansas Republican is serving as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Appropriations Committee, the Senate Permanent subcommittee on Investigations, the House Ways and Means Committee, the House Agriculture Committee, the House Rules Committee, or the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce.

 

Not one Arkansas Republican can take credit for sponsoring or passing a bill, such as Medicare which Wilbur Mills sponsored and passed enabling over 50 million old and disabled Americans to live a longer and better life.

 

When the 2013 Arkansas Republican congressional delegation, as all Republicans for the past 75 years, campaigned on the promise to make government “smaller” few people expected  “smaller” meant  reducing government all the way to 0.

 

At midnight on September 30, 2013 the Arkansas Republican Congressional Delegation along with all other Republican Congressional delegations “shut the government down.”

 

Examine the records of  President Clinton, Senators Robinson, McClellan, Fulbright and Congressmen, Mills, Gathings, Trimble and Harris and the “influence” they had on important issues affecting Arkansas and the nation.

 

Examine the record of the Republicans Arkansas voters sent to Washington.  The American people have never selected an Arkansas Republican to live in the White House.  Name one Arkansas Republican who is/was as “influential” and affected Arkansas and national issues as much as President Clinton, Senators Robinson, McClellan, Fulbright, Congressmen, Mills, Gathings, Trimble, Harris and other Democrats who could be named.

 

It is important who the voters of Arkansas send to Washington to do the “nation’s business” and history shows whether they are a Republican or a Democrat does affect how they do the “nation’s business” so at every election please examine the record of the candidates and the record of their party and choose wisely.

 

 

 

GUN VIOLENCE

 

651,697 Americans were killed in their homes, on the streets, in parking lots, in schools and other public and private places by gun violence in the 18 year period 1979 through 1997.  This was more than ALL Americans killed in battle in ALL wars since 1775 according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

 

 

A partial list of recent gun killings in the U. S with locations: Naval Yard and Army base protected by trained armed guards, 2 restaurants , 2 universities, street, movie theater, place of worship, sign company, shopping mall, elementary school, parking lot, beauty shop, beer distributor, nursing home and immigration center.

 

The dates and the number of people killed at the above locations: September 16, 2013-- 12, December 14, 2012 --27, December 11, 2012 --2, September 27, 2012 --5, August 5, 2012 –6,  April 2, 2012-- 7, March 30, 2012 –5,  October 12, 2011—8, September 6, 2011—5, January 8, 2011—6, August 3, 2010—8,  February 12, 2010—3, November 5, 2009—13, May 5, 2009—13, March 30, 2009—4, March 29, 2009—8, March 10, 2009—10.

 

The NRA and the gun industry have offered two solutions to reduce the number of gun killings (1) “The only thing that that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” (2)”Train and place armed guards at all schools.”

 

There are 331 million people in America.  Mr. LaPierre did not tell us the number of  “good guys”  but if 90% of the population  (280 million) are considered good guys, 280 million “good guys” needing guns to stop the “bad guys” would create millions of dollars in gun sale profits for the gun industry.

 

Would taxpayer be willing to pay the additional millions of dollars necessary to train 3.3 million teachers to be armed guards, buy over 3 million guns to protect 30.1 million students at over 135,000 elementary and secondary school buildings?

 

If armed guards would make schools safe or reduce gun killings why should armed guards be limited only to schools?  Why should Americans not be safe from gun killings while at a restaurant (616,000) at a beauty shop (289,000), at the theater (38,605) and senior citizens while in a nursing homes (16,000) and hundreds of other locations.

 

Armed guards did not keep12 people killed from being killed at the Washington D.C Naval Yard or 13 people from being killed at Fort Hood Army Base?

 

If more guns made a country safer from gun killings the U.S as the leading country in gun ownership with 8.8 of every 10 citizen owning a gun the U.S would be the safest country in the world.  And Japan with less than 1 gun (0.6) per 100 citizens would be the leading country in gun deaths.  In 2011 the U.S had 32,163 gun killings and Japan had fewer than 100 gun killings that year.

 

261 congressional candidates in 2011, 236 Republicans and 25 Democrats, accepted contributions from the NRA.  Follow the money and see if those 236 Republicans and those 25 Democrats vote with/against the NRA on gun issues.

 

One month after 20 6 and 7 year old children were slaughtered at Sandy Hook Elementary School gun sales were UP 400% and membership in the NRA skyrocketed.

 

Sandy Hook and other mass gun killings is the goose which lays golden eggs worth millions of dollars for the gun manufactures and the NRA.

 

For over 30 years Americans have attempted to enact reasonable, common sense laws and regulations relating to guns.

 

For over 30 years the NRA and gun industry have  spread fear which caused many good Americans to believe they would lose their guns and politicians to believe they would be defeated at the next elections and EVERY effort to enact reasonable, common sense laws and regulations has been defeated.

 

Many people believe the large numbers of Americans killed by guns is a national tragedy. For the gun industry and the NRA gun killings are an opportunity to make millions of dollars.

 

What will America do about gun killings in the future?  Continue with more guns, more killings and millions of dollars for the gun industry and the NRA or will we all work together and enact reasonable laws and regulations relating to guns and have fewer guns and have fewer gun killings as in other countries such as Japan, Canada, and  England.

 

Auto manufacturers worked with the American People and politicians to reduce the number of people killed in auto accidents and equip cars at the time they are manufactured with seat belts and air bags.  In 2007 The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimated 15,147 lives were saved by seat belts and had seat belts been used 100% of the time an additional 5,024 lives would have been saved and 2,788 lives were saved by airbags.

 

How many American lives would be saved if the NRA and the gun industry, like the auto industry, would work with the American people and politicians to equip guns at the time of manufacture with safety locks, with technology that would prevent anyone other than the owner being able to fire the gun and requiring gun owners to equip the guns they now own with safety locks and keep their guns in a secure place accessible only to the owner?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEALTH, INCOME, UNEMPLOYMENT AND TAXES

 

Who owns the wealth in the U.S?  Whose wealth grows at the greatest rate?  Who receives the greatest percentage of U.S income and who has the greatest percentage

of income growth?  Who receives most of the tax cuts and who pays the lowest tax rate?

Who has the lowest unemployment rate?

 

WEALTH—the top 20% of Americans own 85% of America’s wealth. The bottom 80% of Americans own 15% of America’s wealth.

 

WEALTH-- for the top 5 % of Americans from 1983--2010 increased 74.2% while the wealth for the bottom 20% declined 2.6%

 

This is the division and growth of WEALTH during the greatest economic growth in America’s history during the Clinton Presidency 1992-2000 and this is the division and growth of wealth when America suffered its second greatest economic collapse during the George W. Bush Presidency 2001-2009.

 

INCOME –The top 1% OF Americans receive 17.2% of America’s income while the bottom 90% receive 55.5%.

 

INCOME GROWTH—income for the top 1% of Americans from 1979 through 2007 grew on average 275% while income for the bottom 20% grew at 18%, according to a study of the non partisan Congressional Budget Office.

 

INCOME GROWTH---income for the top 400 income earners in America increased on average 392% from 1992-2007.

 

This is the division and growth of  INCOME when  Democrats were in control of Congress  and this is the division and growth of income when Republicans controlled Congress

 

RATIO OF CEO PAY TO WORKER PAY-- In 1970 CEO’S made $25.00 for every $1 the average worker made.  In 2010 CEO pay skyrocketed to $500 for every $1 the average worker made.

 

This wide gap between what a CEO and what a worker is paid depends on only one thing---whether you are the CEO or whether you are the worker.  It is not determined by your race, religion political party or how many hours you work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNEMPLOYMENT—the gap in the percentage of unemployed based on household income is at the widest level since these records were begun and the lowest household levels are near the unemployment rate for all workers during the Hoover depression.  The following charts were prepared by the Census Bureau:

 

Household income   Unemployment rate

Under $20,000          2011-24.5% -2012-22.6%-2013-21.3%

$20,000-$39,999      2011-12.2%- 2012-11.2%-2013-10.5%

$40,000-$59,999      2011-7.9%-  2012-7.3%-   2013-6.9%

$60,000-$74,999      2011-6.5%-  2012-5.5%-   2013-5.2%

$75,000-$99,999      2011-4.8%-   2012-4.5%-   2013-4.3%

$100,000-$149,999  2011-3.8%-   2012-4.0%-   2013-3.5%

$150,000+                2011-3.2%-   2012-3.0%-   2013-3.2% 

 

TAX CUTS from 2004-2012 after the Bush largest cuts in history for the top 1%  $522,062.00 and for the bottom 20% $1,426.00.

 

TAX RATE PAID--Warren Buffet the second richest man in the U.S with $60 billion in wealth PAYS A TAX RATE OF 11.6%, a rate lower than the rate his secretary pays--Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican Nominee for President after working 15 years has over $250 million in wealth which produces over $20 million in yearly income on which he pays a tax rate of 13.9%

 

Does your personal wealth fall within the 85% or 15% group?

Does your wealth grow at 74.2% or decline at 2.6%?

Does your income grow 275% or 18%?

Is your rate of unemployment 24.5% or 3.2%?

How much did you receive from the Bush tax cut?

How does your wealth and the tax rate you pay compare to the wealth and tax rate of Warren Buffet and Mitt Romney?

 

Name one industrialized country in the world which has a greater inequality of wealth than the U.S.

 

The facts indicate if you are in the top 10% of Americans you will do well financially in times of economic growth or economic disaster.  If you are in the bottom 10% you will not do well in times of economic growth or economic disaster or the rich always get richer and the poor always get poorer.

 

 

 

 

TAXPAYERS COST OF LITIGATING ARKANSAS ABORTION LAWS

 

   In 1958 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Cooper v. Aaron:   “The State of Arkansas could not pass legislation undermining the Court’s May 17, 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of Education that racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.”  For more than 50 years since that ruling the citizens of Arkansas have paid millions of taxpayer dollars in legal expenses litigating the unconstitutional segregation laws passed by the Arkansas legislature.

 

   In 1989 Arkansas taxpayers in all 75 Arkansas counties were ordered by the court to pay $70 million a year to help finance 6 magnet schools in Little Rock.  You do the math –24 years at $70 million a year –the amount Arkansas taxpayers in Cleburne County and the other 74 counties have paid to the Little Rock School District. No one knows when or if this $70 million yearly payment will end.

 

 In 2012 Judge Price Marshall approved an attorney fee of $875,000.00 to civil rights attorney John Walker to be paid by the Pulaski County Special School District.

 

  On March 26, 2012 a three judge panel of the 8^th U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Arkansas taxpayers must pay $69,972.00 to lawyers for the Little Rock School district and $149,417.50 to the civil rights lawyers who had intervened in the case.

 

  The most recent payment in the ongoing Little Rock school desegregation case was on July 23, 2013 when U.S. District Judge Price Marshall ordered taxpayers in the North Little Rock School District to pay attorney John Walker an additional fee of $87,500.00.

 

    In March 2013 the Republican controlled Arkansas Legislature passed Act 301 entitled the “Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act” banning abortions after the 12^th week of pregnancy.  Governor Beebe vetoed the bill because it was in conflict with Roe v. Wade and unconstitutional.  The Republican legislature overrode the Governor’s veto and Act 301 was scheduled to become law August 13, 2013.

 

   The format for Act 301 and 16 other states was prepared by “American United for Life,” a Washington D.C. group.  Daniel McConchie Vice-President of  American United said:  “..we work with legislators to pass laws that will essentially spark the right kind of court challenge.”

 

  Arkansas Act 301 was promptly challenged in court and in May 2013 U.S. District Judge Susan Weber Wright issued a temporary injunction preventing Act 301 from becoming law until she rules on its constitutionality and stated:  “ the law was likely to be declared unconstitutional.”

 

  State abortion laws in Arizona, Oklahoma, Idaho, Iowa and Kentucky have been held unconstitutional.

 

 

  In this great country it is your privilege to support unconstitutional laws on segregation, abortion or any other subject and vote for lawmakers who enact such laws.

 

   Enacting and litigating unconstitutional segregation laws cost Arkansas taxpayers millions of dollars in legal expenses over the past 50 years millions which should have been spent improving the educational system.

 

   Will Arkansas taxpayers repeat the segregation experience and follow Republican lawmakers to federal court and spend millions of taxpayer dollars litigating unconstitutional abortion laws for the next 50 years?

 

    Will 50 years of litigation on abortion bring people on both sides of the abortion issue closer together or will they become more bitter and polarized?

 

   Will 50 years of litigation on abortion have any effect on the number of abortions?

 

   Some people believe “unwanted pregnancies” are the problem not abortion and they further believe society would be better served if we spent our time and millions of taxpayers dollars making pregnancy a “purposeful decision” not a “mistake.”

 

  Americans in 25 years eliminated polio and have made AIDS a treatable disease instead of a death sentence.

 

  If Americans would spend their time and resources reducing the number of “unwanted pregnancies” as they did on eliminating polio and making AIDS a treatable disease we would certainly reduce the number of “unwanted pregnancies” and make abortions unnecessary.

 

  Will Republican make government smaller by spending millions of taxpayer dollars enacting unconstitutional abortion laws and litigating those laws for the next 50 years? Reduce your taxes?

 

  Should the Arkansas legislature make the decision when and under what circumstances an Arkansas woman may exercise her constitutional right to have an abortion or should that be the decision of the woman involved, her doctor and her family?

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANYTHING I NEED TO DO TO WIN

 

     On August 15, 2013 New Jersey Republican governor Chris Christie appeared before the Republican National Committee summer meeting in Boston and made a speech which  many believe was the announcement of  his candidacy for president in the 2016 Republican primary.

 

   Christie told the RNC “I am going to do ANYTHING I need to do TO WIN.  I think we have some folks who think we have to be college professors.  For our ideas TO WIN we have to govern.  And if we don’t WIN we don’t govern.  There is nothing wrong with our party.  We should focus entirely on the mechanics of electing Republicans.  We are a political operation that wants TO WIN.”.

 

      Steve Munisteri, chairman of the Texas Republican Party summarized Christie’s remarks as follows:  “I took all that to mean, I’m going to run in 2016, and I’ve demonstrated a winning formula. And if you want to WIN and don’t care about ideology, I’m your candidate.”

 

     Many Republicans in the 2012 Republican presidential primary said Mitt Romney “would say anything to WIN,” including Fox News host Bill O’Reilly and GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum.  So Christie’s pledge “to do ANYTHING I need to do TO WIN” is following in Romney’s footsteps—the Republican nominee in 2012.

 

    On August 16, 2013 the Republican National Committee voted unanimously to ban CNN and NBC from participating in the Republican 2016 presidential primary.  Christie went a step further and said “Republicans should not have debates within the party over foreign policy, social issues and legislative tactics.”

 

   If Republicans do not participate in any debates, or only a few, how will voters know the Republican position on the issues?

 

   Christie in a jab at another potential 2016 presidential candidate, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal  said  “I am not going to be one of those people who are going to call our party stupid.  I’m not going to be one of those people who are navel gazing.”

 

     Last month Christie said Rand Paul, another potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate’s, criticism of the government’s surveillance programs was “dangerous and part of an esoteric, intellectual debate.”

 

     Obviously Christie is willing to SAY ANYTHING about his fellow Republicans  needed to WIN.

 

    

 

    Christie said “We have an opportunity as a party to drive a wedge in the union movement.  And the laboratory where that is happening right now is in my state.”

    

     A continuation of the Republican divide and conquer politics of the last 50 years.

 

      Karl Rove, the most successful Republican political consultant for the last 30 years believes Republicans have lost a number of races (such as the Todd Akin race in Missouri and the Richard  Mourdock race in Indiana) “because the wrong candidates were selected.” Rove has formed The Conservative Victory Project which will intensely vet prospective Republican contenders for congressional races to weed out candidates who The Conservative Victory Project believe is too flawed to WIN general elections.

 

     So anyone who wishes to be a candidate in certain Republican races must first pass the Karl Rove WIN test.

 

   Eric Cantor, Republican majority leader in the House revealed why Republicans “will do or say anything to WIN” in this statement: “Look we screwed up when we were in the majority….We fell in love with POWER.”   Yes POWER.

 

   It appears Republicans love of POWER in 2016 will cause them to focus on candidates who will DO ANYTHING they need to do to WIN.

 

   Check closely in 2016 and see if you can find candidates who promise:

“I will do anything I need to do TO reduce the number of people living in poverty, TO reduce the number of unemployed, TO reduce the gap between the wages of workers and CEO’s, TO solve the immigration problem, TO provide adequate health care for all Americans, TO reduce the number of people killed with guns, TO provide for the common good not a select few.